MLB matchup analysis

Cubs vs Red Sox (Game 1) Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Friday, September 25, 2026 at Fenway Park · 1:05 PM ET

Pass

Leo decision: Pass on Cubs vs Red Sox

Lab Rating
3.1/10
Model lean
Red Sox 55.8%
Market probability
48.1%
Model edge
+7.7%
Best moneyline
+104
Sportsbooks checked
9
Leo model
55.8%
Market
48.1%

The case for Boston Red Sox

Pitching plan edge: 23 points
Leo gives the Boston Red Sox pitching plan the edge over Clay Holmes (23 points on Leo's pitcher score). Alec Gamboa is projected for only 1⅔ innings, with the Boston Red Sox bullpen covering the rest -- this compares the Boston Red Sox blended starting-pitcher-and-bullpen quality against Clay Holmes's own line, not two starters directly.

The case for Chicago Cubs

Team strength favors Chicago Cubs
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, Leo's own team-strength model has Chicago Cubs ahead (56.9% to 49.6%). The pick still comes from Boston Red Sox once the pitcher and bullpen terms are applied.

Why it is not official

Below the 61.0% official gate
Win probability is 55.8%. Leo does not make a game official below 61.0%, no matter how good the price is. This is a value spot, not a high-confidence winner.
Setup quality below the bar
Lab Rating is 3.1/10, under the 7.2/10 required for an official pick.
Cold stretch at the plate
Boston Red Sox is -0.035 wOBA below its own season form.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 0.41/10
Leo leans toward Boston Red Sox, but not strongly enough to earn full conviction credit.
Pitching plan: 29.33/40
Boston Red Sox rates 72 on Leo's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). That is a strong start on its own, and it earns most or all of the available credit here.
Offense: 1.42/50
Boston Red Sox's recent form does not clearly outpace Chicago Cubs's.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 49.6%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, Leo's team-strength model alone makes Boston Red Sox 49.6% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 3 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Boston Red Sox by 3 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Bullpen adjustment: +0.039
The bullpen-fatigue gap between the two pens nudges the price toward Boston Red Sox. This moves the price less than the starting pitchers do, since a starter covers more of the game than the bullpen.
Net effect: 49.6% -> 55.8%
Team strength alone had Boston Red Sox at 49.6%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 55.8% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict Leo passes. The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.
Read the full model output

The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.

Final result

Cubs 3, Red Sox 4

How the analysis held up

Boston Red Sox won, the side Leo's model favored.

Alec Gamboa (Boston Red Sox) was Leo's favored starter by pitcher score, but Clay Holmes actually pitched better tonight: 4.1 IP, 2 ER (4.15 ERA) against 2.0 IP, 3 ER (13.50 ERA). The edge did not show up in this game.

The Boston Red Sox bullpen was not flagged pregame, but it had a night worth noting: 0 earned runs allowed over 7.0 relief innings (0.00 ERA) — quietly better than the pregame read implied.

Game information

MatchupChicago Cubs at Boston Red Sox
DateFriday, September 25, 2026
First pitch1:05 PM ET
VenueFenway Park
Starting pitchersClay Holmes vs Alec Gamboa
WeatherGame-time forecast: 62°F, 22% precipitation chance, 11 mph wind from N.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
Clay HolmesCubs · RHP
vs
Alec GamboaRed Sox · LHP
MetricCubsRed Sox
Pitching planTraditional starterOpener / bullpen game
Expected innings5⅔1⅔
ThrowsRL
Leo pitcher score (higher is better)6972
ERA (lower is better)3.291.91
WHIP (lower is better)1.191.15
K/9 (higher is better)6.96.3
K-BB% (higher is better)8.6%9.1%
K% (higher is better)18.6%17.4%
BB% (lower is better)10.0%8.3%
BB/9 (lower is better)3.73.0
HR/9 (lower is better)0.50.3
Ground-ball rate65.4%58.6%
Fly-ball rate34.6%41.4%

Pitching plan edge: Leo gives the Boston Red Sox pitching plan the edge over Clay Holmes (23 points on Leo's pitcher score). Alec Gamboa is projected for only 1⅔ innings, with the Boston Red Sox bullpen covering the rest -- this compares the Boston Red Sox blended starting-pitcher-and-bullpen quality against Clay Holmes's own line, not two starters directly.

Blended read: For the Boston Red Sox, the bullpen is projected to throw more of the game than Alec Gamboa (about 1⅔ innings for the starter), so Leo grades that side on a whole-game effective ERA of 1.94 rather than Alec Gamboa's own 1.91. Whole-game, that is 1.94 for the Boston Red Sox against 3.57 on the other side, so the blended read leans Boston Red Sox.

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

Clay Holmes strikeouts
4.2 Leo projected Ks
No strikeout line posted when this page was generated
Alec Gamboa strikeouts
1.0 Leo projected Ks
No strikeout line posted when this page was generated

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Cubs are 5-5 in their last 10 and averaging 4.9 runs per game over the last 15 days; Red Sox are 4-6 in their last 10 and averaging 2.5 runs per game over the last 15 days. On the season Cubs carry the better run differential per game (+0.89 against +0.51).

MetricCubsRed Sox
Last 105-54-6
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)3-7 on the road5-5 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.7780.628
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.3400.282
Runs per game, last 15 days4.92.5
K% last 15 days (lower is better)17.7%24.8%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysCubsRed Sox
OPS0.783 (+0.018 vs szn)0.655 (-0.062 vs szn)
Runs per game5.32 (+0.079 vs szn)3.00 (-1.267 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.3430.293 (-0.024 vs szn)
K% (lower is better)18.4% (-2.7% vs szn)23.6% (+1.9% vs szn)

Over the last 30 days the Cubs have been the better offense, 0.343 wOBA to 0.293.

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricCubsRed Sox
Record88-7185-74
Run differential / game (team quality)+0.89+0.51
Runs scored / game (offense, season)5.244.27
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.353.76
Season OPS0.7680.719
K% season (lower is better)21.1%21.7%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.7970.712

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Cubs and Red Sox are highlighted.

Cubs
Combined risk
5.2 Normal
Fatigue
5.7 Normal
Efficiency
6.0 Effective
Red Sox
Combined risk
3.9 Normal
Fatigue
4.8 Normal
Efficiency
6.9 Effective

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricCubsRed Sox
Fatigue5.7/10, Normal4.8/10, Normal
Efficiency6.0/10, Effective6.9/10, Effective
Combined risk5.2/10, Normal3.9/10, Normal
Relief innings, last 7 days22.015.3
Back-to-back arms33
7-day ERA2.861.17
7-day WHIP1.141.24

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
Leo projection
6.4
Market total
6.5
Projected away runs
4.7
Projected home runs
1.7
Over price
-105
Under price
-102
Chicago Cubs team total
4.7 projected
Line 3.5 · O +114 / U -135
Over research lean (+1.2)
Boston Red Sox team total
1.7 projected
Line 2.5 · O -144 / U +116
Under research lean (-0.8)

The model and market are close. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every Leo pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. Leo provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.