Week 4 · Sunday 13:00
DAL
at
HOU
Reliant Stadium · closed · astroturf
DAL moneyline+130
HOU moneyline-155
SpreadHOU -3
Total48.5
Dallas Cowboys at Houston Texans
Every game this week on Leo’s Week 4 card →
This is a pre-game analysis page. Every stat above the Final result comes from games played before this one (through Week 3), and Leo’s numbers were frozen before kickoff. Market numbers are the closing line. Nothing here is a wager — the pick gate stays closed until Leo shows it can beat that line.
Leo’s read
What the model expected, frozen before kickoff (Oct 4, 8:16 AM ET). Each player projection is rate × volume × opponent adjustment — the columns show every input. None of this is a wager.
Leo win chanceDAL 55%chance to win; information, not a pick
Leo total49points, both teams
Leo marginHOU by 1.9expected winning margin
Passing yards
| Player | yds/att | att | opp adj | games | Leo |
|---|
| Dak Prescott DAL QB1 |
7.2 | 35.7 | 1 | 3 |
263 |
| C.J. Stroud HOU QB1 |
6.8 | 36.7 | 1 | 3 |
231 |
Rushing yards
| Player | yds/carry | car | opp adj | games | Leo |
|---|
| Javonte Williams DAL RB1 |
4.6 | 15.1 | 0.9 | 3 |
64 |
| David Montgomery HOU RB1 |
4.1 | 12.2 | 1.2 | 3 |
59 |
| Woody Marks HOU RB2 |
3.8 | 8.7 | 1.2 | 3 |
39 |
| Tyler Goodson DAL RB2 |
4.3 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 1 |
14 |
Receiving yards
| Player | yds/tgt | tgt | opp adj | games | Leo |
|---|
| CeeDee Lamb DAL WR1 |
11.4 | 8.7 | 1 | 3 |
107 |
| Nico Collins HOU WR1 |
9 | 8.8 | 1 | 1 |
79 |
| George Pickens DAL WR2 |
6.8 | 8.2 | 1 | 3 |
62 |
| Xavier Hutchinson HOU WR2 |
6.1 | 5.2 | 1 | 3 |
34 |
| Ryan Flournoy DAL WR3 |
4.5 | 4.9 | 1 | 3 |
27 |
| Jared Wayne HOU WR3 |
7.9 | 2.8 | 1 | 3 |
25 |
Get Leo’s NFL card by email
Every game, Leo’s winner and total, and the most likely touchdown scorers, before kickoff. Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Injury report
The official Week 4 report for each side, as captured Mon, Oct 5, 5:46 PM ET. Teams file game statuses on the last practice day; anyone not listed is expected to play. Final inactives come 90 minutes before kickoff.
DAL
Game status
2 out
- Out
DeMarvion OvershownLB
Hamstring
- Out
Cobie DurantCB
Hamstring
HOU
Game status
2 out · 4 questionable
- Out
Azeez Al-ShaairLB
Groin
- Out
M.J. StewartS
Knee
- Questionable
Ed IngramG
Groin
- Questionable
Jadeveon ClowneyDE
Knee
- Questionable
Logan HallDE
Knee
- Questionable
Jake HansenLB
Calf
Leo ratings — head to head
Each rating is 0–100 against the league this season, built from efficiency rather than record: 50 is average, every 15 points is one standard deviation. These describe the teams — they are not used to price the game.
DAL
This season
HOU
69
QuarterbackEPA, accuracy, giveaways
42
63
Offenseefficiency, explosives, ball security
44
22
DefenseEPA allowed, pressure, takeaways
67
43
Overall
56
QB 63 · OFF 60 · DEF 27
Last season
QB 46 · OFF 45 · DEF 75
The turnover battle
Interceptions thrown against interceptions caught, and the same for fumbles. Bold is the better side of each line.
DAL |
Per game, this season |
HOU |
| 0.33 | Interceptions thrown | 0.00 |
| 0.00 | Interceptions caught | 0.33 |
| 0.33 | Fumbles lost | 0.67 |
| 2.00 | Fumbles forced | 1.00 |
| 2.00 | Takeaways | 1.33 |
| 0.67 | Giveaways | 0.67 |
| +1.33 | Net turnover margin | +0.67 |
Efficiency detail
The inputs behind the ratings above, shown raw so you can check the work.
DAL |
Offense |
HOU |
| +0.254 | EPA per dropback | -0.030 |
| +4.0 | Completion % over expected | -2.9 |
| 1.5% | Interception rate | 1.2% |
| 3.9% | Sack rate taken | 6.3% |
| -0.028 | Rush EPA per carry | -0.096 |
| 5.0% | Explosive play rate | 5.2% |
DAL |
Defense |
HOU |
| +0.180 | EPA allowed per play | -0.086 |
| 6.23 | Yards allowed per play | 5.32 |
| 2.3% | Sack rate | 5.5% |
| 0.3% | Interception rate forced | 1.3% |
Team comparison
Season totals on both sides of the ball. Left column is DAL, right is HOU.
DAL |
This season |
HOU |
| 3 | Games | 3 |
| 243.3 | Pass yards/g | 264.7 |
| 94.3 | Rush yards/g | 84.7 |
| 7 | Passing TD | 3 |
| 1 | Interceptions thrown | 0 |
| 207.7 | Pass yards allowed/g | 258.7 |
| 179.7 | Rush yards allowed/g | 86.7 |
| 0 | Interceptions forced | 1 |
DAL |
Last season |
HOU |
| 278.5 | Pass yards/g | 232.5 |
| 125.6 | Rush yards/g | 108.6 |
| 31 | Passing TD | 26 |
| 12 | Interceptions thrown | 14 |
| 265.9 | Pass yards allowed/g | 200.7 |
| 125.5 | Rush yards allowed/g | 92.7 |
This season
Starting quarterback, lead backs and top receivers, by actual usage this season — games before this one only.
DAL
2026
Quarterback
Leo QB69
| Player | G | C/ATT | Comp% | Yards | Y/G | TD/INT | Y/A |
| Dak Prescott | 3 | 73/105 |
69.5% | 730 | 243.3 |
7 / 1 | 7 |
Running back
| Player | G | Car | Yards | Y/C | TD |
| Javonte Williams | 3 | 43 |
169 | 3.9 | 2 |
| Tyler Goodson | 1 | 6 |
22 | 3.7 | 0 |
Receivers
| Player | G | Rec/Tgt | Catch% | Yards | Y/G | TD |
| CeeDee Lamb WR1 | 3 |
20/25 | 80% | 309 |
103 | 3 |
| George Pickens WR2 | 3 |
16/25 | 64% | 150 |
50 | 0 |
| Jake Ferguson TE | 3 |
9/11 | 81.8% | 72 |
24 | 3 |
HOU
2026
Quarterback
Leo QB42
| Player | G | C/ATT | Comp% | Yards | Y/G | TD/INT | Y/A |
| C.J. Stroud | 3 | 72/120 |
60% | 794 | 264.7 |
3 / 0 | 6.6 |
Running back
| Player | G | Car | Yards | Y/C | TD |
| David Montgomery | 3 | 37 |
103 | 2.8 | 2 |
| Woody Marks | 3 | 22 |
65 | 3 | 1 |
Receivers
| Player | G | Rec/Tgt | Catch% | Yards | Y/G | TD |
| Xavier Hutchinson WR1 | 3 |
9/21 | 42.9% | 120 |
40 | 0 |
| Jared Wayne WR2 | 3 |
4/12 | 33.3% | 65 |
21.7 | 0 |
| Dalton Schultz TE | 3 |
19/25 | 76% | 205 |
68.3 | 0 |
Last season
The same players' full prior season, for a baseline the early-season sample cannot give you.
DAL
2025
Quarterback
Leo QB63
| Player | G | C/ATT | Comp% | Yards | Y/G | TD/INT | Y/A |
| Dak Prescott | 17 | 404/600 |
67.3% | 4552 | 267.8 |
30 / 10 | 7.6 |
Running back
| Player | G | Car | Yards | Y/C | TD |
| Javonte Williams | 16 | 252 |
1201 | 4.8 | 11 |
| Malik Davis | 10 | 52 |
250 | 4.8 | 2 |
Receivers
| Player | G | Rec/Tgt | Catch% | Yards | Y/G | TD |
| George Pickens WR1 | 17 |
93/137 | 67.9% | 1429 |
84.1 | 9 |
| CeeDee Lamb WR2 | 13 |
75/117 | 64.1% | 1077 |
82.8 | 3 |
| Jake Ferguson TE | 17 |
82/102 | 80.4% | 600 |
35.3 | 8 |
HOU
2025
Quarterback
Leo QB46
| Player | G | C/ATT | Comp% | Yards | Y/G | TD/INT | Y/A |
| C.J. Stroud | 16 | 314/502 |
62.5% | 3503 | 218.9 |
21 / 13 | 7 |
Running back
| Player | G | Car | Yards | Y/C | TD |
| Woody Marks | 18 | 229 |
832 | 3.6 | 3 |
| Nick Chubb | 17 | 136 |
568 | 4.2 | 3 |
Receivers
| Player | G | Rec/Tgt | Catch% | Yards | Y/G | TD |
| Nico Collins WR1 | 16 |
74/127 | 58.3% | 1138 |
71.1 | 6 |
| Jayden Higgins WR2 | 19 |
50/82 | 61% | 623 |
32.8 | 6 |
| Dalton Schultz TE | 19 |
87/112 | 77.7% | 836 |
44 | 3 |
Touchdown props
Leo’s chance that each player scores a rushing or receiving touchdown in this game, the three most likely on each side, from its last read before kickoff.
Most likely to score: David Montgomery (HOU, 46%) and CeeDee Lamb (DAL, 45%). In 2023 to 2025, Leo’s top pick in a game scored 47% of the time, and at least one of its top two scored 69% of the time.
DAL
Leo’s chance
- CeeDee Lamb
WR1
45%
scored
- Javonte Williams
RB1
44%
scored 3
- George Pickens
WR2
25%
no TD
HOU
Leo’s chance
- David Montgomery
RB1
46%
no TD
- Nico Collins
WR1
38%
scored 2
- Woody Marks
RB2
25%
scored
Final result
DAL 34
– 30 HOU 
How the game was played
Quarterback, the backs who carried it and the receivers who caught it.
DAL
| Dak Prescott QB |
32/45 | 335 yds | 1 TD | 0 INT |
| Javonte Williams RB |
19 car | 62 yds | 3 TD | 5 rec, 21 yds |
| Tyler Goodson RB |
3 car | 12 yds | 0 TD | |
| CeeDee Lamb WR |
1 car | -6 yds | 0 TD | 17 rec, 189 yds |
| CeeDee Lamb WR |
17/21 | 189 yds | 1 TD | |
| George Pickens WR |
2/3 | 75 yds | 0 TD | |
| Ryan Flournoy WR |
4/5 | 37 yds | 0 TD | |
HOU
| C.J. Stroud QB |
21/31 | 347 yds | 2 TD | 0 INT |
| David Montgomery RB |
10 car | 24 yds | 0 TD | |
| Woody Marks RB |
6 car | 22 yds | 1 TD | |
| Jaylin Noel WR |
1 car | 4 yds | 0 TD | 3 rec, 85 yds |
| Nico Collins WR |
7/8 | 118 yds | 2 TD | |
| Jaylin Noel WR |
3/3 | 85 yds | 0 TD | |
| Xavier Hutchinson WR |
3/5 | 46 yds | 0 TD | |
How Leo’s read held up
What Leo expected before kickoff, the posted number he was calling against, and what happened. A winner call is only made when one side is above 60%; a yardage or points call needs a real gap from the line before Leo takes a side.
| Market | Leo expected | Line | Actual | Leo’s side and result |
|---|
| Winner | DAL 55% | — | DAL won | NO PICK |
| Total points | 49 | 48.5 | 64 | no side · within 1.5 pts |
| Margin | HOU by 1.9 | HOU −3 | DAL by 4 | DAL +3 · RIGHT |
“Main reason” names which of Leo’s two inputs was further off — how much the player was used, or how efficient he was when he was.
Passing yards
| Player | Line | Leo | Side | Actual | Off by | Main reason | Result |
|---|
| C.J. Stroud HOU |
244.5 | 231 |
UNDER |
347 |
116 |
More efficient (11.2 vs 6.8 yds/att) |
WRONG |
| Dak Prescott DAL |
266.5 | 263 |
no side |
335 |
72 |
More attempts (45 vs 35.7 expected) |
NO LEAN |
Rushing yards
| Player | Line | Leo | Side | Actual | Off by | Main reason | Result |
|---|
| David Montgomery HOU |
44.5 | 59 |
OVER |
24 |
35 |
Less efficient (2.4 vs 4.1 yds/carry) |
WRONG |
| Woody Marks HOU |
33.5 | 39 |
OVER |
22 |
17 |
Fewer carries (6 vs 8.7 expected) |
WRONG |
| Javonte Williams DAL |
59.5 | 64 |
OVER |
62 |
2 |
On target |
RIGHT |
| Tyler Goodson DAL |
— | 14 |
no side |
12 |
2 |
On target |
|
Receiving yards
| Player | Line | Leo | Side | Actual | Off by | Main reason | Result |
|---|
| CeeDee Lamb DAL |
76.5 | 107 |
OVER |
189 |
82 |
More targets (21 vs 8.7 expected) |
RIGHT |
| Nico Collins HOU |
72.5 | 79 |
OVER |
118 |
39 |
More efficient (14.8 vs 9 yds/tgt) |
RIGHT |
| George Pickens DAL |
70.5 | 62 |
UNDER |
75 |
13 |
More efficient (25 vs 6.8 yds/tgt) |
WRONG |
| Xavier Hutchinson HOU |
26.5 | 34 |
OVER |
46 |
12 |
More efficient (9.2 vs 6.1 yds/tgt) |
RIGHT |
| Ryan Flournoy DAL |
33.5 | 27 |
UNDER |
37 |
10 |
More efficient (7.4 vs 4.5 yds/tgt) |
WRONG |
Player and team statistics from the open nflverse dataset. Roles assigned by actual usage — most attempts, carries and targets — not depth chart.