MLB matchup analysis

Mets vs Nationals Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Saturday, September 26, 2026 at Nationals Park · 12:35 PM ET

Pass

Leo decision: Pass on Mets vs Nationals

Lab Rating
5.1/10
Model lean
Nationals 68.0%
Market probability
50.2%
Model edge
+17.8%
Best moneyline
-106
Sportsbooks checked
9
Leo model
68.0%
Market
50.2%

The case for Washington Nationals

Why Leo leans Washington Nationals
Leo's model makes Washington Nationals 68.0% to win. No single factor dominates — the starting pitcher matchup tilt the same way, enough to lean Washington Nationals even though it does not clear the bar for a high-confidence pick.

The case for New York Mets

The case is thin
The model finds little going New York Mets's way — it trails on the pitching plan, bullpen, and recent form. The main path to a New York Mets win is variance.

Why it is not official

Setup quality below the bar
Lab Rating is 5.1/10, under the 7.2/10 required for an official pick.
Own bullpen carries risk: 8.4/10
The Washington Nationals bullpen comes in high risk. A lead after six innings is less safe than usual.
Cold stretch at the plate
Washington Nationals is -0.027 wOBA below its own season form.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 6.5/10
Leo's win probability for Washington Nationals (68.0%) is well clear of a coin flip -- this is a real, stated lean, not a guess.
Pitching plan: 24/40
Connelly Early rates 70 on Leo's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). That is a strong start on its own, and it earns most or all of the available credit here.
Offense: 20.08/50
Washington Nationals's recent form does not clearly outpace New York Mets's.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 54.7%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, Leo's team-strength model alone makes Washington Nationals 54.7% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 11 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Washington Nationals by 11 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Bullpen adjustment: -0.021
The bullpen-fatigue gap between the two pens nudges the price toward New York Mets. This moves the price less than the starting pitchers do, since a starter covers more of the game than the bullpen.
Net effect: 54.7% -> 68.0%
Team strength alone had Washington Nationals at 54.7%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 68.0% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict Leo passes. The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.
Read the full model output

The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.

Final result

Mets 7, Nationals 1

How the analysis held up

New York Mets won. Leo's model favored the other side.

Leo's two internal reads disagreed pregame by 43.3 points — the team-strength model favored Washington Nationals, the run-projection model favored New York Mets. The run-projection model had the winner here.

Connelly Early (Washington Nationals), the starter Leo's pitcher score favored, actually outpitched Jonah Tong: 3.0 IP, 0 ER (0.00 ERA) against 5.0 IP, 1 ER (1.80 ERA). The edge held up. Both starters were sharp; the edge is a narrow one between two good outings.

The New York Mets bullpen was flagged as elevated risk pregame (Tired). In relief it actually allowed 0 earned runs over 4.0 innings (0.00 ERA) — the risk read did not show up on the scoreboard tonight.

The Washington Nationals bullpen was flagged as elevated risk pregame (High risk). In relief it actually allowed 6 earned runs over 6.0 innings (9.00 ERA) — the risk read showed up. Note: 1 of the runs charged to the Washington Nationals pitching staff overall was unearned — not something the bullpen's stuff should be blamed for.

New York Mets scored 7, 1.5 more than the 5.5 pregame projection.

Washington Nationals scored 1, 3.9 fewer than the 4.9 pregame projection.

Likely driver: the Washington Nationals bullpen allowed 6 earned runs over 6.0 relief innings (9.00 ERA), which is exactly the risk flagged pregame, and the New York Mets bullpen quietly shut the game down (0.00 ERA over 4.0 innings).

Game information

MatchupNew York Mets at Washington Nationals
DateSaturday, September 26, 2026
First pitch12:35 PM ET
VenueNationals Park
Starting pitchersJonah Tong vs Connelly Early
WeatherGame-time forecast: 58°F, 38% precipitation chance, 10 mph wind from NW.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
Jonah TongMets · RHP
vs
Connelly EarlyNationals · LHP
MetricMetsNationals
Pitching planTraditional starterTraditional starter
Expected innings5⅓5⅓
ThrowsRL
Leo pitcher score (higher is better)6370
ERA (lower is better)3.823.33
WHIP (lower is better)1.241.23
K/9 (higher is better)10.08.9
K-BB% (higher is better)14.9%15.0%
K% (higher is better)25.4%23.5%
BB% (lower is better)10.4%8.5%
BB/9 (lower is better)4.13.2
HR/9 (lower is better)0.61.4
Ground-ball rate36.7%47.0%
Fly-ball rate63.3%53.0%

Pitcher edge: Leo gives Connelly Early a 7-point edge over Jonah Tong, driven mainly by BB/9 (3.2 vs 4.1) and ERA (3.33 vs 3.82).

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

Jonah Tong strikeouts
6.3 Leo projected Ks
Official pick: OVER 4.5K · +1.9K difference
Market 4.5K · O +101 / U -120 · 6 books
Connelly Early strikeouts
6.0 Leo projected Ks
Official pick: OVER 3.5K · +2.7K difference
Market 3.5K · O +130 / U -166 · 3 books

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Mets are 4-6 in their last 10 and averaging 4.4 runs per game over the last 15 days; Nationals are 7-3 in their last 10 and averaging 4.8 runs per game over the last 15 days. Season run differential separates them by almost nothing (-0.19 against +0.02).

MetricMetsNationals
Last 104-67-3
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)6-4 on the road7-3 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.7110.683
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.3110.301
Runs per game, last 15 days4.44.8
K% last 15 days (lower is better)20.7%21.8%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysMetsNationals
OPS0.736 (+0.032 vs szn)0.684 (-0.059 vs szn)
Runs per game5.18 (+0.862 vs szn)4.54 (-0.524 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.323 (+0.011 vs szn)0.301 (-0.025 vs szn)
K% (lower is better)20.9% (-1.4% vs szn)22.9% (+1.1% vs szn)

Over the last 30 days the Mets have been the better offense, 0.323 wOBA to 0.301. They are running hot against their own season line (+0.011 wOBA).

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricMetsNationals
Record73-8776-84
Run differential / game (team quality)-0.19+0.02
Runs scored / game (offense, season)4.325.06
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.505.04
Season OPS0.7030.745
K% season (lower is better)22.3%21.8%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.6840.734

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Mets and Nationals are highlighted.

Mets
Combined risk
7.7 Tired
Fatigue
7.6 Tired
Efficiency
4.9 Average
Nationals
Combined risk
8.4 High risk
Fatigue
8.3 High risk
Efficiency
4.8 Average

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricMetsNationals
Fatigue7.6/10, Tired8.3/10, High risk
Efficiency4.9/10, Average4.8/10, Average
Combined risk7.7/10, Tired8.4/10, High risk
Relief innings, last 7 days24.731.3
Back-to-back arms45
7-day ERA4.013.73
7-day WHIP1.421.60

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
Leo projection
10.1
Market total
8.5
Projected away runs
5.5
Projected home runs
4.2
Over price
+135
Under price
+120
New York Mets team total
5.5 projected
Line 4.5 · O +118 / U -130
Over research lean (+1.0)
Washington Nationals team total
4.2 projected
Line 3.5 · O -124 / U +114
Over research lean (+0.7)

The model projects 1.6 runs above the market total. A research lean still requires a setup rating of at least 7.0/10. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every Leo pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. Leo provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.