MLB matchup analysis

Diamondbacks vs Rockies Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Tuesday, September 22, 2026 at Coors Field · 8:40 PM ET

Pass

Leo decision: Pass on Diamondbacks vs Rockies

Lab Rating
6.3/10
Model lean
Diamondbacks 73.7%
Market probability
58.9%
Model edge
+14.8%
Best moneyline
-150
Sportsbooks checked
5
Leo model
73.7%
Market
58.9%

The case for Arizona Diamondbacks

Starting pitcher edge: 29 points
Leo gives Michael Soroka a 29-point edge over Kyle Freeland, driven mainly by ERA (3.45 vs 6.56) and HR/9 (0.69 vs 1.88).
Bats are hot: +0.022 wOBA
Arizona Diamondbacks is outhitting its own season form over the last 15 days. Recent form is context, not a model input, but it points the same way here.

The case for Colorado Rockies

The case is thin
The model finds little going Colorado Rockies's way — it trails on the pitching plan, bullpen, and recent form. The main path to a Colorado Rockies win is variance.

Why it is not official

Setup quality below the bar
Lab Rating is 6.3/10, under the 7.2/10 required for an official pick.
Own bullpen carries risk: 6.7/10
The Arizona Diamondbacks bullpen comes in tired. A lead after six innings is less safe than usual.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 9.32/10
Leo's win probability for Arizona Diamondbacks (73.7%) is well clear of a coin flip -- this is a real, stated lean, not a guess.
Pitching plan: 30.67/40
Michael Soroka rates 73 on Leo's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). That is a strong start on its own, and it earns most or all of the available credit here.
Offense: 22.83/50
Arizona Diamondbacks's recent form does not clearly outpace Colorado Rockies's.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 47.4%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, Leo's team-strength model alone makes Arizona Diamondbacks 47.4% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 28 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Arizona Diamondbacks by 28 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Bullpen adjustment: -0.009
The bullpen-fatigue gap between the two pens nudges the price toward Colorado Rockies. This moves the price less than the starting pitchers do, since a starter covers more of the game than the bullpen.
Net effect: 47.4% -> 73.7%
Team strength alone had Arizona Diamondbacks at 47.4%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 73.7% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict Leo passes. The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.
Read the full model output

The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.

Final result

Diamondbacks 7, Rockies 2

How the analysis held up

Arizona Diamondbacks won, the side Leo's model favored.

Michael Soroka (Arizona Diamondbacks), the starter Leo's pitcher score favored, actually outpitched Kyle Freeland: 7.0 IP, 1 ER (1.29 ERA) against 3.0 IP, 5 ER (15.00 ERA). The edge held up.

The Arizona Diamondbacks bullpen was not flagged pregame, but it had a night worth noting: 0 earned runs allowed over 2.0 relief innings (0.00 ERA) — quietly better than the pregame read implied. Note: 1 of the runs charged to the Arizona Diamondbacks pitching staff overall was unearned — not something the bullpen's stuff should be blamed for.

Arizona Diamondbacks scored 7, 4.2 more than the 2.8 pregame projection.

Game information

MatchupArizona Diamondbacks at Colorado Rockies
DateTuesday, September 22, 2026
First pitch8:40 PM ET
VenueCoors Field
Starting pitchersMichael Soroka vs Kyle Freeland
WeatherGame-time forecast: 72°F, 21% precipitation chance, 14 mph wind from S.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
Michael SorokaDiamondbacks · RHP
vs
Kyle FreelandRockies · LHP
MetricDiamondbacksRockies
Pitching planTraditional starterTraditional starter
Expected innings5⅓5
ThrowsRL
Leo pitcher score (higher is better)7344
ERA (lower is better)3.456.56
WHIP (lower is better)1.131.50
K/9 (higher is better)8.77.3
K-BB% (higher is better)17.5%13.3%
K% (higher is better)23.5%18.1%
BB% (lower is better)6.1%4.8%
BB/9 (lower is better)2.22.0
HR/9 (lower is better)0.71.9
Ground-ball rate44.6%50.0%
Fly-ball rate55.4%50.0%

Pitcher edge: Leo gives Michael Soroka a 29-point edge over Kyle Freeland, driven mainly by ERA (3.45 vs 6.56) and HR/9 (0.69 vs 1.88).

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

Michael Soroka strikeouts
5.8 Leo projected Ks
Official pick: OVER 4.5K · +1.4K difference
Market 4.5K · O +105 / U -125 · 6 books
Kyle Freeland strikeouts
3.4 Leo projected Ks
Official pick: OVER 2.5K · +1.2K difference
Market 2.5K · O -120 / U +103 · 6 books

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Diamondbacks are 4-6 in their last 10 and averaging 4.8 runs per game over the last 15 days; Rockies are 2-8 in their last 10 and averaging 3.7 runs per game over the last 15 days. On the season Diamondbacks carry the better run differential per game (+0.03 against -1.16).

MetricDiamondbacksRockies
Last 104-62-8
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)7-3 on the road3-7 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.7730.731
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.3370.323
Runs per game, last 15 days4.83.7
K% last 15 days (lower is better)20.2%23.2%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysDiamondbacksRockies
OPS0.700 (-0.015 vs szn)0.734
Runs per game3.96 (-0.496 vs szn)4.07 (-0.572 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.308 (-0.007 vs szn)0.324
K% (lower is better)21.1% (+1.6% vs szn)23.4% (+0.5% vs szn)

Over the last 30 days the Rockies have been the better offense, 0.324 wOBA to 0.308.

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricDiamondbacksRockies
Record82-7457-99
Run differential / game (team quality)+0.03-1.16
Runs scored / game (offense, season)4.464.64
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.435.80
Season OPS0.7140.739
K% season (lower is better)19.5%22.9%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.7780.755

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Diamondbacks and Rockies are highlighted.

Diamondbacks
Combined risk
6.7 Tired
Fatigue
7.7 Tired
Efficiency
7.1 Effective
Rockies
Combined risk
6.4 Tired
Fatigue
7.1 Tired
Efficiency
6.5 Effective

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricDiamondbacksRockies
Fatigue7.7/10, Tired7.1/10, Tired
Efficiency7.1/10, Effective6.5/10, Effective
Combined risk6.7/10, Tired6.4/10, Tired
Relief innings, last 7 days25.029.0
Back-to-back arms65
7-day ERA1.802.48
7-day WHIP0.880.97

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
Leo projection
4.8
Market total
11.0
Projected away runs
2.8
Projected home runs
2.3
Over price
-113
Under price
+100
Arizona Diamondbacks team total
2.8 projected
Line 6.5 · O +105 / U -121
Under research lean (-3.7)
Colorado Rockies team total
2.3 projected
Line 4.5 · O +100 / U -120
Under research lean (-2.2)

The model projects 6.2 runs below the market total. A research lean still requires a setup rating of at least 7.0/10. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every Leo pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. Leo provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.