MLB matchup analysis

Marlins vs Cubs Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Thursday, September 24, 2026 at Wrigley Field · 2:20 PM ET

Pass

Leo decision: Pass on Marlins vs Cubs

Lab Rating
5.2/10
Model lean
Cubs 52.2%
Market probability
64.3%
Model edge
-12.1%
Best moneyline
-210
Sportsbooks checked
6
Leo model
52.2%
Market
64.3%

The case for Chicago Cubs

Late-inning bullpen advantage
Miami Marlins relievers have a 5.40 ERA over the last 7 days; Chicago Cubs relievers have a 3.15. Miami Marlins also have 6 arms pitching on back-to-back days, against 4 for Chicago Cubs. If this is still close after six innings, that gap favors Chicago Cubs.

The case for Miami Marlins

Their bats are hot: +0.009 wOBA
Miami Marlins is outhitting its own season form over the last 15 days.

Why it is not official

Below the 61.0% official gate
Win probability is 52.2%. Leo does not make a game official below 61.0%, no matter how good the price is. This is a value spot, not a high-confidence winner.
Setup quality below the bar
Lab Rating is 5.2/10, under the 7.2/10 required for an official pick.
Own bullpen carries risk: 6.4/10
The Chicago Cubs bullpen comes in tired. A lead after six innings is less safe than usual.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 0/10
Leo's own win probability for Chicago Cubs (52.2%) is close enough to a coin flip that the rating credits little or no conviction -- credit only starts above 55%.
Pitching plan: 20/40
Matthew Boyd rates 66 on Leo's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). That is a strong start on its own, and it earns most or all of the available credit here.
Offense: 31.85/50
Chicago Cubs's recent offensive form clearly outpaces Miami Marlins's over the tracked windows.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 55.9%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, Leo's team-strength model alone makes Chicago Cubs 55.9% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 1 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Miami Marlins by 1 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Bullpen adjustment: +0.093
The bullpen-fatigue gap between the two pens nudges the price toward Chicago Cubs. This moves the price less than the starting pitchers do, since a starter covers more of the game than the bullpen.
Net effect: 55.9% -> 52.2%
Team strength alone had Chicago Cubs at 55.9%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 52.2% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict Leo passes. The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.
Read the full model output

The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.

Final result

Marlins 1, Cubs 2

How the analysis held up

Chicago Cubs won, the side Leo's model favored.

Tyler Phillips (No clear pitching-plan edge), the starter Leo's pitcher score favored, actually outpitched Matthew Boyd: 4.0 IP, 0 ER (0.00 ERA) against 7.0 IP, 1 ER (1.29 ERA). The edge held up. Both starters were sharp; the edge is a narrow one between two good outings.

The Miami Marlins bullpen was flagged as elevated risk pregame (High risk). In relief it actually allowed 2 earned runs over 4.0 innings (4.50 ERA) — the risk read showed up.

The Chicago Cubs bullpen was not flagged pregame, but it had a night worth noting: 0 earned runs allowed over 2.0 relief innings (0.00 ERA) — quietly better than the pregame read implied.

Game information

MatchupMiami Marlins at Chicago Cubs
DateThursday, September 24, 2026
First pitch2:20 PM ET
VenueWrigley Field
Starting pitchersTyler Phillips vs Matthew Boyd
WeatherGame-time forecast: 63°F, 0% precipitation chance, 5 mph wind from NE.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
Tyler PhillipsMarlins · RHP
vs
Matthew BoydCubs · LHP
MetricMarlinsCubs
Pitching planTraditional starterTraditional starter
Expected innings4⅔5⅔
ThrowsRL
Leo pitcher score (higher is better)6566
ERA (lower is better)3.343.91
WHIP (lower is better)1.331.21
K/9 (higher is better)7.26.8
K-BB% (higher is better)8.4%11.0%
K% (higher is better)18.8%18.5%
BB% (lower is better)10.4%7.5%
BB/9 (lower is better)4.02.8
HR/9 (lower is better)1.21.1
Ground-ball rate54.3%49.6%
Fly-ball rate45.7%50.4%

Pitcher edge: Leo gives Matthew Boyd a 1-point edge over Tyler Phillips, driven mainly by expected innings (5.8 vs 4.5) and BB/9 (2.8 vs 4.0).

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

Tyler Phillips strikeouts
3.4 Leo projected Ks
No K play · -0.1K difference is below Leo's 0.7K threshold
Market 3.5K · O +115 / U -130 · 2 books
Matthew Boyd strikeouts
5.0 Leo projected Ks
Official pick: OVER 3.5K · +1.6K difference
Market 3.5K · O -110 / U +120 · 2 books

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Marlins are 6-4 in their last 10 and averaging 4.8 runs per game over the last 15 days; Cubs are 5-5 in their last 10 and averaging 5.0 runs per game over the last 15 days. On the season Cubs carry the better run differential per game (+0.92 against +0.02).

MetricMarlinsCubs
Last 106-45-5
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)4-6 on the road6-4 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.7530.763
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.3310.334
Runs per game, last 15 days4.85.0
K% last 15 days (lower is better)23.4%18.1%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysMarlinsCubs
OPS0.711 (-0.014 vs szn)0.796 (+0.028 vs szn)
Runs per game4.78 (+0.350 vs szn)5.56 (+0.293 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.3150.348 (+0.010 vs szn)
K% (lower is better)23.5% (+1.5% vs szn)18.3% (-2.9% vs szn)

Over the last 30 days the Cubs have been the better offense, 0.348 wOBA to 0.315. They are running hot against their own season line (+0.010 wOBA).

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricMarlinsCubs
Record78-8087-71
Run differential / game (team quality)+0.02+0.92
Runs scored / game (offense, season)4.435.29
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.414.37
Season OPS0.7270.768
K% season (lower is better)22.0%21.1%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.6890.759

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Marlins and Cubs are highlighted.

Marlins
Combined risk
9.5 High risk
Fatigue
9.0 High risk
Efficiency
4.1 Below average
Cubs
Combined risk
6.4 Tired
Fatigue
6.8 Tired
Efficiency
5.8 Effective

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricMarlinsCubs
Fatigue9.0/10, High risk6.8/10, Tired
Efficiency4.1/10, Below average5.8/10, Effective
Combined risk9.5/10, High risk6.4/10, Tired
Relief innings, last 7 days21.720.0
Back-to-back arms64
7-day ERA5.403.15
7-day WHIP1.431.20

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
Leo projection
9.4
Market total
3.5
Projected away runs
4.0
Projected home runs
5.8
Over price
+1200
Under price
-118
Miami Marlins team total
4.0 projected
Line 2.5 · O -105 / U -120
Over research lean (+1.5)
Chicago Cubs team total
5.8 projected
Line 3.5 · O -110 / U -114
Over research lean (+2.3)

The model projects 5.9 runs above the market total. A research lean still requires a setup rating of at least 7.0/10. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every Leo pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. Leo provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.