MLB matchup analysis

Marlins vs Cubs Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Wednesday, September 23, 2026 at Wrigley Field · 7:40 PM ET

Analysis still building. This page is available to users but is not submitted for search indexing until these inputs are complete: market price.
Pass

Leo decision: Pass on Marlins vs Cubs

Lab Rating
5.4/10
Model lean
Cubs 61.5%
Market probability
62.8%
Model edge
-1.3%
Best moneyline
-187
Sportsbooks checked
2
Leo model
61.5%
Market
62.8%

The case for Chicago Cubs

Late-inning bullpen advantage
Miami Marlins relievers have a 5.56 ERA over the last 7 days; Chicago Cubs relievers have a 4.12. Miami Marlins also have 6 arms pitching on back-to-back days, against 3 for Chicago Cubs. If this is still close after six innings, that gap favors Chicago Cubs.

The case for Miami Marlins

The case is thin
The model finds little going Miami Marlins's way — it trails on the pitching plan, bullpen, and recent form. The main path to a Miami Marlins win is variance.

Why it is not official

Setup quality below the bar
Lab Rating is 5.4/10, under the 7.2/10 required for an official pick.
Own bullpen carries risk: 6.3/10
The Chicago Cubs bullpen comes in tired. A lead after six innings is less safe than usual.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 3.25/10
Leo leans toward Chicago Cubs, but not strongly enough to earn full conviction credit.
Pitching plan: 17.33/40
Kevin Gausman rates 64 on Leo's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). Average or below by that measure, so it earns little or none of the available credit here -- independent of who the opponent is throwing.
Offense: 33.48/50
Chicago Cubs's recent offensive form clearly outpaces Miami Marlins's over the tracked windows.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 58.6%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, Leo's team-strength model alone makes Chicago Cubs 58.6% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 4 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Chicago Cubs by 4 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Bullpen adjustment: +0.048
The bullpen-fatigue gap between the two pens nudges the price toward Chicago Cubs. This moves the price less than the starting pitchers do, since a starter covers more of the game than the bullpen.
Net effect: 58.6% -> 61.5%
Team strength alone had Chicago Cubs at 58.6%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 61.5% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict Leo passes. The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.
Read the full model output

The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.

Final result

Marlins 3, Cubs 2

How the analysis held up

Miami Marlins won. Leo's model favored the other side.

Kevin Gausman (Chicago Cubs), the starter Leo's pitcher score favored, actually outpitched Ryan Gusto: 5.2 IP, 2 ER (3.18 ERA) against 5.1 IP, 2 ER (3.38 ERA). The edge held up.

The Miami Marlins bullpen was flagged as elevated risk pregame (Tired). In relief it actually allowed 0 earned runs over 3.2 innings (0.00 ERA) — the risk read did not show up on the scoreboard tonight.

Miami Marlins scored 3, 1.6 fewer than the 4.6 pregame projection.

Chicago Cubs scored 2, 4.3 fewer than the 6.3 pregame projection.

Likely driver: Chicago Cubs's offense scored 4.3 fewer runs than projected, and the Miami Marlins bullpen quietly shut the game down (0.00 ERA over 3.2 innings).

Game information

MatchupMiami Marlins at Chicago Cubs
DateWednesday, September 23, 2026
First pitch7:40 PM ET
VenueWrigley Field
Starting pitchersRyan Gusto vs Kevin Gausman
WeatherGame-time forecast: 62°F, 0% precipitation chance, 8 mph wind from NE.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
Ryan GustoMarlins · RHP
vs
Kevin GausmanCubs · RHP
MetricMarlinsCubs
Pitching planLimited starterTraditional starter
Expected innings4⅓5⅔
ThrowsRR
Leo pitcher score (higher is better)6064
ERA (lower is better)3.954.42
WHIP (lower is better)1.431.25
K/9 (higher is better)7.59.4
K-BB% (higher is better)11.7%18.5%
K% (higher is better)18.7%24.7%
BB% (lower is better)7.0%6.2%
BB/9 (lower is better)2.82.3
HR/9 (lower is better)1.11.3
Ground-ball rate48.4%47.9%
Fly-ball rate51.6%52.1%

Pitcher edge: Leo gives Kevin Gausman a 4-point edge over Ryan Gusto, driven mainly by expected innings (5.5 vs 4.3) and K-BB% (18.5% vs 11.7%).

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

Ryan Gusto strikeouts
3.7 Leo projected Ks
No K play · +0.2K difference is below Leo's 0.7K threshold
Market 3.5K · O -132 / U +120 · 6 books
Kevin Gausman strikeouts
6.2 Leo projected Ks
Official pick: OVER 5.5K · +0.7K difference
Market 5.5K · O -138 / U +111 · 6 books

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Marlins are 5-5 in their last 10 and averaging 5.4 runs per game over the last 15 days; Cubs are 6-4 in their last 10 and averaging 5.5 runs per game over the last 15 days. On the season Cubs carry the better run differential per game (+0.92 against +0.03).

MetricMarlinsCubs
Last 105-56-4
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)5-5 on the road5-5 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.7480.763
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.3280.335
Runs per game, last 15 days5.45.5
K% last 15 days (lower is better)24.5%19.3%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysMarlinsCubs
OPS0.721 (-0.006 vs szn)0.803 (+0.034 vs szn)
Runs per game4.81 (+0.365 vs szn)5.74 (+0.431 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.3190.351 (+0.012 vs szn)
K% (lower is better)23.7% (+1.6% vs szn)18.0% (-3.1% vs szn)

Over the last 30 days the Cubs have been the better offense, 0.351 wOBA to 0.319. They are running hot against their own season line (+0.012 wOBA).

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricMarlinsCubs
Record77-8087-70
Run differential / game (team quality)+0.03+0.92
Runs scored / game (offense, season)4.455.31
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.424.39
Season OPS0.7270.769
K% season (lower is better)22.0%21.2%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.7410.760

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Marlins and Cubs are highlighted.

Marlins
Combined risk
7.9 Tired
Fatigue
7.4 Tired
Efficiency
4.0 Below average
Cubs
Combined risk
6.3 Tired
Fatigue
6.4 Tired
Efficiency
5.2 Average

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricMarlinsCubs
Fatigue7.4/10, Tired6.4/10, Tired
Efficiency4.0/10, Below average5.2/10, Average
Combined risk7.9/10, Tired6.3/10, Tired
Relief innings, last 7 days22.719.7
Back-to-back arms63
7-day ERA5.564.12
7-day WHIP1.411.22

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
Leo projection
10.3
Market total
7.5
Projected away runs
4.4
Projected home runs
6.2
Over price
-108
Under price
-108
Miami Marlins team total
4.4 projected
Line 2.5 · O -118 / U +104
Over research lean (+1.9)
Chicago Cubs team total
6.2 projected
Line 3.5 · O -111 / U -104
Over research lean (+2.7)

The model projects 2.8 runs above the market total. A research lean still requires a setup rating of at least 7.0/10. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every Leo pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. Leo provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.