MLB matchup analysis

Cubs vs Marlins Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Sunday, September 6, 2026 at loanDepot park · 1:40 PM ET

Official Pick

Leo prediction: Chicago Cubs moneyline

Lab Rating
9.3/10
Model lean
Cubs 68.0%
Market probability
56.1%
Model edge
+11.9%
Best moneyline
-133
Sportsbooks checked
9
Leo model
68.0%
Market
56.1%

The case for Chicago Cubs

Starting pitcher edge: 8 points
Leo gives Clay Holmes a 8-point edge over Tyler Phillips, driven mainly by expected innings (5.7 vs 4.6) and HR/9 (0.52 vs 1.17).
Bats are hot: +0.051 wOBA
Chicago Cubs is outhitting its own season form over the last 15 days. Recent form is context, not a model input, but it points the same way here.

The case for Miami Marlins

The case is thin
The model finds little going Miami Marlins's way — it trails on the pitching plan, bullpen, and recent form. The main path to a Miami Marlins win is variance.

What to watch

Own bullpen carries risk: 6.8/10
The Chicago Cubs bullpen comes in tired. A lead after six innings is less safe than usual.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 6.5/10
Leo's win probability for Chicago Cubs (68.0%) is well clear of a coin flip -- this is a real, stated lean, not a guess.
Pitching plan: 36/40
Clay Holmes rates 73 on Leo's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). That is a strong start on its own, and it earns most or all of the available credit here.
Offense: 50/50
Chicago Cubs's recent offensive form clearly outpaces Miami Marlins's over the tracked windows.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 57.5%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, Leo's team-strength model alone makes Chicago Cubs 57.5% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 12 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Chicago Cubs by 12 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Bullpen adjustment: +0.024
The bullpen-fatigue gap between the two pens nudges the price toward Chicago Cubs. This moves the price less than the starting pitchers do, since a starter covers more of the game than the bullpen.
Net effect: 57.5% -> 68.0%
Team strength alone had Chicago Cubs at 57.5%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 68.0% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict Leo backs Chicago Cubs at -133. 68.0% to win against a market implying 56.1% - the model sees value and the setup clears every gate.
Read the full model output

Chicago Cubs is an official moneyline pick because it clears both gates: 68.0% model win probability and 9.3/10 Lab Rating. Leo projects 68.0% against a 56.1% no-vig market number, a 11.9% model edge at -133. Chicago Cubs owns the starting pitcher edge by 12 points. Bullpen read: Elevated volatility. Chicago Cubs's pen efficiency: Below average (4.3/10). Lineup check: Chicago Cubs is swinging a hot bat (+0.131 OPS); Miami Marlins is a touch below its season form (-0.036 OPS). Recent form supports this side and is included in the unified run projection.

Final result

Cubs 3, Marlins 10

How the analysis held up

Miami Marlins won. Leo's model favored the other side.

Clay Holmes (Chicago Cubs) was Leo's favored starter by pitcher score, but Tyler Phillips actually pitched better tonight: 5.0 IP, 3 ER (5.40 ERA) against 4.1 IP, 8 ER (16.62 ERA). The edge did not show up in this game. Both starters struggled; this was not a case of one clean outing beating one bad one.

The Miami Marlins bullpen was flagged as elevated risk pregame (Tired). In relief it actually allowed 0 earned runs over 4.0 innings (0.00 ERA) — the risk read did not show up on the scoreboard tonight.

Chicago Cubs scored 3, 4.2 fewer than the 7.2 pregame projection.

Miami Marlins scored 10, 5.6 more than the 4.4 pregame projection.

Likely driver: Clay Holmes, the pick's own starter, was rocked for a 16.62 ERA, and Miami Marlins's offense scored 5.6 more runs than projected.

Game information

MatchupChicago Cubs at Miami Marlins
DateSunday, September 6, 2026
First pitch1:40 PM ET
VenueloanDepot park
Starting pitchersClay Holmes vs Tyler Phillips
WeatherGame-time forecast: 81°F, 13% precipitation chance, 4 mph wind from S. This venue has a roof, but the roof status is not confirmed.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
Clay HolmesCubs · RHP
vs
Tyler PhillipsMarlins · RHP
MetricCubsMarlins
Pitching planTraditional starterTraditional starter
Expected innings5⅔4⅔
ThrowsRR
Leo pitcher score (higher is better)7365
ERA (lower is better)2.833.51
WHIP (lower is better)1.121.33
K/9 (higher is better)6.87.3
K-BB% (higher is better)10.0%9.2%
K% (higher is better)18.6%18.9%
BB% (lower is better)8.6%9.8%
BB/9 (lower is better)3.13.7
HR/9 (lower is better)0.51.2
Ground-ball rate64.9%52.7%
Fly-ball rate35.1%47.3%

Pitcher edge: Leo gives Clay Holmes a 8-point edge over Tyler Phillips, driven mainly by expected innings (5.7 vs 4.6) and HR/9 (0.52 vs 1.17).

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

Clay Holmes strikeouts
4.7 Leo projected Ks
No K play · +0.2K difference is below Leo's 0.7K threshold
Market 4.5K · O -114 / U -104 · 4 books
Tyler Phillips strikeouts
3.5 Leo projected Ks
No K play · -0.0K difference is below Leo's 0.7K threshold
Market 3.5K · O -154 / U +123 · 4 books

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Cubs are 5-5 in their last 10 and averaging 7.4 runs per game over the last 15 days; Marlins are 4-6 in their last 10 and averaging 4.1 runs per game over the last 15 days. On the season Cubs carry the better run differential per game (+0.92 against +0.10).

MetricCubsMarlins
Last 105-54-6
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)4-6 on the road5-5 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.9030.687
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.3910.307
Runs per game, last 15 days7.44.1
K% last 15 days (lower is better)17.5%21.8%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysCubsMarlins
OPS0.841 (+0.070 vs szn)0.717 (-0.008 vs szn)
Runs per game6.18 (+0.845 vs szn)4.61 (+0.255 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.365 (+0.025 vs szn)0.321
K% (lower is better)19.5% (-1.9% vs szn)22.3% (+0.6% vs szn)

Over the last 30 days the Cubs have been the better offense, 0.365 wOBA to 0.321. They are running hot against their own season line (+0.025 wOBA).

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricCubsMarlins
Record81-6271-72
Run differential / game (team quality)+0.92+0.10
Runs scored / game (offense, season)5.334.38
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.424.28
Season OPS0.7720.723
K% season (lower is better)21.4%21.8%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.7570.737

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Cubs and Marlins are highlighted.

Cubs
Combined risk
6.8 Tired
Fatigue
6.4 Tired
Efficiency
4.3 Below average
Marlins
Combined risk
7.6 Tired
Fatigue
6.7 Tired
Efficiency
3.3 Below average

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricCubsMarlins
Fatigue6.4/10, Tired6.7/10, Tired
Efficiency4.3/10, Below average3.3/10, Below average
Combined risk6.8/10, Tired7.6/10, Tired
Relief innings, last 7 days25.326.7
Back-to-back arms57
7-day ERA5.336.08
7-day WHIP1.341.69

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
Leo projection
12.5
Market total
13.5
Projected away runs
7.4
Projected home runs
4.6
Over price
+115
Under price
+105
Chicago Cubs team total
7.4 projected
Line 4.5 · O -104 / U -118
Over research lean (+2.9)
Miami Marlins team total
4.6 projected
Line 3.5 · O +106 / U -120
Over research lean (+1.1)

The model projects 1.0 runs below the market total. A research lean still requires a setup rating of at least 7.0/10. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every Leo pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. Leo provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.