MLB matchup analysis

Astros vs Rays Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Saturday, September 12, 2026 at Tropicana Field · 6:10 PM ET

Pass

Leo decision: Pass on Astros vs Rays

Lab Rating
5.7/10
Model lean
Rays 56.1%
Market probability
56.7%
Model edge
-0.6%
Best moneyline
-140
Sportsbooks checked
9
Leo model
56.1%
Market
56.7%

The case for Tampa Bay Rays

Late-inning bullpen advantage
Houston Astros relievers have a 4.32 ERA over the last 7 days; Tampa Bay Rays relievers have a 4.34. If this is still close after six innings, that gap favors Tampa Bay Rays.

The case for Houston Astros

The case is thin
The model finds little going Houston Astros's way — it trails on the pitching plan, bullpen, and recent form. The main path to a Houston Astros win is variance.

Why it is not official

Below the 61.0% official gate
Win probability is 56.1%. Leo does not make a game official below 61.0%, no matter how good the price is. This is a value spot, not a high-confidence winner.
Setup quality below the bar
Lab Rating is 5.7/10, under the 7.2/10 required for an official pick.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 0.56/10
Leo leans toward Tampa Bay Rays, but not strongly enough to earn full conviction credit.
Pitching plan: 24/40
Ian Seymour rates 69 on Leo's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). That is a strong start on its own, and it earns most or all of the available credit here.
Offense: 32.42/50
Tampa Bay Rays's recent offensive form clearly outpaces Houston Astros's over the tracked windows.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 56.6%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, Leo's team-strength model alone makes Tampa Bay Rays 56.6% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 1 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Tampa Bay Rays by 1 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Bullpen adjustment: +0.084
The bullpen-fatigue gap between the two pens nudges the price toward Tampa Bay Rays. This moves the price less than the starting pitchers do, since a starter covers more of the game than the bullpen.
Net effect: 56.6% -> 56.1%
Team strength alone had Tampa Bay Rays at 56.6%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 56.1% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict Leo passes. The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.
Read the full model output

The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.

Final result

Astros 2, Rays 3

How the analysis held up

Tampa Bay Rays won, the side Leo's model favored.

Peter Lambert (No clear pitching-plan edge) was Leo's favored starter by pitcher score, but Ian Seymour actually pitched better tonight: 6.0 IP, 2 ER (3.00 ERA) against 6.0 IP, 3 ER (4.50 ERA). The edge did not show up in this game.

The Houston Astros bullpen was flagged as elevated risk pregame (High risk). In relief it actually allowed 0 earned runs over 2.0 innings (0.00 ERA) — the risk read did not show up on the scoreboard tonight.

The Tampa Bay Rays bullpen was not flagged pregame, but it had a night worth noting: 0 earned runs allowed over 3.0 relief innings (0.00 ERA) — quietly better than the pregame read implied.

Game information

MatchupHouston Astros at Tampa Bay Rays
DateSaturday, September 12, 2026
First pitch6:10 PM ET
VenueTropicana Field
Starting pitchersPeter Lambert vs Ian Seymour
WeatherGame-time forecast: 81°F, 17% precipitation chance, 0 mph wind from NE.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
Peter LambertAstros · RHP
vs
Ian SeymourRays · LHP
MetricAstrosRays
Pitching planTraditional starterTraditional starter
Expected innings5⅔4⅔
ThrowsRL
Leo pitcher score (higher is better)6769
ERA (lower is better)3.714.27
WHIP (lower is better)1.221.14
K/9 (higher is better)8.711.0
K-BB% (higher is better)13.8%22.8%
K% (higher is better)22.9%29.5%
BB% (lower is better)9.1%6.7%
BB/9 (lower is better)3.52.5
HR/9 (lower is better)0.91.7
Ground-ball rate37.8%39.5%
Fly-ball rate62.2%60.5%

Pitcher edge: Leo gives Ian Seymour a 2-point edge over Peter Lambert, driven mainly by K-BB% (22.8% vs 13.8%) and K/9 (11.0 vs 8.7).

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

Peter Lambert strikeouts
3.1 Leo projected Ks
Official pick: UNDER 4.5K · -1.3K difference
Market 4.5K · O +132 / U -160 · 6 books
Ian Seymour strikeouts
6.6 Leo projected Ks
Official pick: OVER 5.5K · +1.1K difference
Market 5.5K · O +110 / U -125 · 6 books

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Astros are 5-5 in their last 10 and averaging 3.6 runs per game over the last 15 days; Rays are 6-4 in their last 10 and averaging 5.0 runs per game over the last 15 days. On the season Rays carry the better run differential per game (+0.40 against -0.29).

MetricAstrosRays
Last 105-56-4
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)5-5 on the road7-3 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.6780.747
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.2980.325
Runs per game, last 15 days3.65.0
K% last 15 days (lower is better)23.2%16.8%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysAstrosRays
OPS0.686 (-0.036 vs szn)0.704 (-0.028 vs szn)
Runs per game3.93 (-0.537 vs szn)4.25 (-0.264 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.299 (-0.018 vs szn)0.310 (-0.013 vs szn)
K% (lower is better)24.1% (+2.2% vs szn)16.3% (-2.0% vs szn)

Over the last 30 days the Rays have been the better offense, 0.310 wOBA to 0.299. They are cooling off against their own season line (-0.013 wOBA). Astros are striking out at 24.1% over the window — something the opposing starter can lean on.

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricAstrosRays
Record75-7388-59
Run differential / game (team quality)-0.29+0.40
Runs scored / game (offense, season)4.464.51
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.754.11
Season OPS0.7240.732
K% season (lower is better)21.8%18.4%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.7130.755

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Astros and Rays are highlighted.

Astros
Combined risk
8.3 High risk
Fatigue
8.4 High risk
Efficiency
5.3 Average
Rays
Combined risk
5.5 Normal
Fatigue
5.4 Normal
Efficiency
4.9 Average

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricAstrosRays
Fatigue8.4/10, High risk5.4/10, Normal
Efficiency5.3/10, Average4.9/10, Average
Combined risk8.3/10, High risk5.5/10, Normal
Relief innings, last 7 days25.018.7
Back-to-back arms67
7-day ERA4.324.34
7-day WHIP1.081.29

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
Leo projection
6.5
Market total
Not available
Projected away runs
2.3
Projected home runs
3.6
Over price
Not available
Under price
Not available
Houston Astros team total
2.3 projected
Line Not available · O Not available / U Not available
Market line pending
Tampa Bay Rays team total
3.6 projected
Line Not available · O Not available / U Not available
Market line pending

The current model and market total cannot be compared yet. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every Leo pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. Leo provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.